Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 634203
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:16:07+00:00 2026-05-13T20:16:07+00:00

My project modules are organized in such a way that I have to maintain

  • 0

My project modules are organized in such a way that I have to maintain following Database structure.

I’ve 5 schemas, each containing 20 to 50 tables. Each schema is associated with one module of the project.

All the tables that are used within more than one modules are kept in “COMMON” schema.
Each module takes 2 to 5 months to finish.

So when first module is finished we are opening it for use, and continuing with the second one and so on. Meanwhile real data is being inserted into the finished module’s schema. Also table definitions of the finished module’s schema might change slightly depending on the bug fixes and suggestions.

I want to be able to backup/restore, synchronize database schema by schema
(I think it’s called vertical partitioning?)

In DB2 there was a way to put tables to different tablespaces, and backup/restore tablespaces separately.

I’m looking for similar or better solutions for the problem in SQL Server.
So Problems:

  1. How to apply table definition
    changes to the table that’s
    containing real data.
  2. Being able to
    update/change/restore/backup/synchronize
    database schema by schema

Any kind of advices are greatly welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:16:07+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:16 pm

    Another way to approach this would to be to create distinct file groups for each schema and manage the back up of each set of files outside of SQL Server if SQL Server doesn’t allow file group specific backups.
    Splitting up your db across files can also improve performance, e.g. if you place indexes on a separate filegroup & physical disc from your table data.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming that we have a project named project and modules module1 and module2 ,
I have a next structure of my project: /application /modules /default /layouts ... /news
I am have modular structure in my project --application ----modules -----admin ------models -----client ------models
Every time I make a project I develop several generic routines/modules/libraries that I expect
So, I have Flex project that loads a Module using the ModuleManager - not
Background: I work in a suite of ASP.NET applications that have several different modules.
In my project, modules are organized in subdirs for tidiness. My project dir hierarchy:
I have a project that I am working on that references a Common Library
I have a java project consisting of three modules project-common project-a project-b Project a
I'm trying to split a Maven WAR project into two modules, so that I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.