Home/ Questions/Q 223421
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T19:13:11+00:00

My purpose is to chose between CruiseControl and Hudson as continuous integration tool for

  • 0

My purpose is to chose between CruiseControl and Hudson as continuous integration tool for java desktop application.
I have seen lots of reading comparing Hudson and CruiseControl.
In terms of features and ease of use, Hudson seems the best.

But in terms of robustness, reliability with heavy configuration and finally in the long term, is this still true ?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    My vote goes to Hudson.

    • robustness: I have never seen Hudson crash, although minor bugs did surface between releases but were squashed impressively fast. Also, it’s being used by Netbeans, JBoss, Eclipse, Apache – I’d say it’s pretty robust to handle those workloads;
    • reliability with heavy configuration: I’m not sure what you mean here. It is extremely configurable;
    • in the long term: there is a strong community behind Hudson, the lead committer quotes 120 developers contributing to the codebase,

    I’d say go for Hudson and never look back.

    • 0