Home/ Questions/Q 9200377
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-17T22:45:14+00:00

My question is – does Dataomic require the explicit manual creation of unique sequence

  • 0

My question is – does Dataomic require the explicit manual creation of unique sequence numbers by the end user? Or is it just the example provided?

I’m reading through the Datomic tutorial.

When I look at the data that gets loaded in seattle-data0.dtm I see on the first two lines:

[
{:district/region :region/e, :db/id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001], :district/name "East"}
{:db/id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000002], :neighborhood/name "Capitol Hill", :neighborhood/district #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001]}

Notice in particular the values 

:db/id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001],
:db/id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000002]
#db/id[:db.part/user -1000001]

Perhaps you can help me understand – this appears to explicitly require a manually generated unique ID sequence number when preparing data for insert.

Surely in a modern database we can rely on the database to generate sequence numbers for us?

When I go to do my own example schema and data insert – I find that I am required to insert manual ID numbers as well. What am I missing?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    To answer your question: No Datomic doesn’t require the end user to generate identifiers. What you see in the seattle example are temporary ids.

    Every time you want to add some facts about new entities to Datomic, you have to give every new entity a temporary id. This id will be replaced with a real unique id by Datomic.

    Now you may ask yourself why do you have to use this temporary ids in the first place? Temporary ids are needed to express relationships between all new entities in one single transaction. In your example, you have the ids:

    :db/id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001],
:db/id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000002]
#db/id[:db.part/user -1000001]

    two of them are the same (I’ll explain the negative numbers in a moment). That means that the new entity marked with the temporary id #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001] is the same in both assertions.

    Now I have to explain the data literal (other link) #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001]. #db/id is the tag for a Datomic temporary id. The tag is followed by a vector of two components :db.part/user and -1000001. The first part is the database partition and is mandatory. The second part is optional. If you write just #db/id[:db.part/user], you get a fresh (different) temporary id every time this literal occurs. If you write #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001] you get the same temporary id every time you use the negative index -1000001. So #db/id[:db.part/user -1000001] is different to #db/id[:db.part/user -1000002].

    I don’t exactly know why the examples use indices below 1000000. The JavaDoc of tempid where the data literal of #db/id resolves to, says, that the numbers from -1 (inclusive) to -1000000 (exclusive) are reserved for user-created temp ids. So maybe someone can shed some light on this.

    To sum this up: #db/id[...] are temporary ids to express same entities in one transaction and are replaced by real unique ids by Datomic at the end of the transaction. If you don’t have to refer to the same entity in a transaction twice, you are fine with just #db/id[:db.part/user] for every temporary id.

    • 0