Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
My question seems to be dump, but because i was studying this new technique, i’ve found that NoSql has changed from its beginning, for example, in the beginning there was the problem of see your own update, and for example Facebook dident let users to update their comments due to the write once, read many
So, do i change all concepts that i’ve read in 2010-2012 tutorials?
Has NoSql beat the CAP theorem ?
I agree this can easily turn into discussion. I’ll give brief answers from my experience to your two questions:
No, the concepts haven’t changed. The landscape seems to be growing quite a bit as lots of companies get into the NoSQL space. Beware vendor promises!
No way. Just read this article this morning, it is a great explanation on some of the issues with the CAP theorem: http://codahale.com/you-cant-sacrifice-partition-tolerance/