Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5998803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T00:27:29+00:00 2026-05-23T00:27:29+00:00

My server has the following requirements: 1) each new connection to the server will

  • 0

My server has the following requirements:

1) each new connection to the server will trigger a series of N posix_fadvise calls.
2) the first few fadvise calls per connection should happen ASAP
3) ability to re-order the fadvise calls if the client makes a
subsequent requests.

I am thinking: thread pool with shared queue, where thread pool size is ~100. Any other suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T00:27:29+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 12:27 am

    There is no point in having multiple threads blocking in fadvise at the same time for the same underlying device, since they’re all sharing the same request queue anyway.

    This means that you should only need a single readahead thread, that takes readahead requests from a queue and executes them sequentially.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm having trouble with my Clojure server middlewares. My app has the following requirements:
I am running MySQL server on the server's which has following specifications - Dual
I have a following scenario in my SQL Server 2005 database. zipcodes table has
I am communicating with a server, each message sent to the server has to
I have the following requirements for an application that many people will be using
I have a thttpd server set-up which has the following html file. When I
Server has created a socket and bound to a port and started a thread
If your server has SSL enabled, and you're using YUI uploader, is it possible
Our Team Foundation Server has to build three different versions of the same solution.
It seems that SQL Server has a fair amount of XML support. Mostly I've

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.