Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 88275
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:32:03+00:00 2026-05-10T22:32:03+00:00

My singleton accessor method is usually some variant of: static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;

  • 0

My singleton accessor method is usually some variant of:

static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;  + (MyClass *)instance {     @synchronized(self)     {         if (gInstance == NULL)             gInstance = [[self alloc] init];     }      return(gInstance); } 

What could I be doing to improve this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:32:04+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:32 pm

    Another option is to use the +(void)initialize method. From the documentation:

    The runtime sends initialize to each class in a program exactly one time just before the class, or any class that inherits from it, is sent its first message from within the program. (Thus the method may never be invoked if the class is not used.) The runtime sends the initialize message to classes in a thread-safe manner. Superclasses receive this message before their subclasses.

    So you could do something akin to this:

    static MySingleton *sharedSingleton;  + (void)initialize {     static BOOL initialized = NO;     if(!initialized)     {         initialized = YES;         sharedSingleton = [[MySingleton alloc] init];     } } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 61k
  • Answers 61k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer My solution is to use two tables and fix the… May 11, 2026 at 9:52 am
  • added an answer You could define 2 different Style properties in your custom… May 11, 2026 at 9:52 am
  • added an answer Use the Matcher find method (instead of the matches method) May 11, 2026 at 9:52 am

Related Questions

My singleton accessor method is usually some variant of: static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
I am using the singleton pattern in all my PHP class files. Would it
How do I implement the singleton pattern in C#? I want to put my
In all my projects till now, I use to use singleton pattern to access
Shouldn't classes in DAL (customerDAL) be singleton? Since my controllers (customerController) exposes Shared Subs,
My website was recently attacked by, what seemed to me as, an innocent code:
My company is using CVS as our de-facto standard for source control. However, I've
My office has a central Source Safe 2005 install that we use for source
My current development project has two aspects to it. First, there is a public
My dilemma is, basically, how to share an enumeration between two applications. The users

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.