Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9222279
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T03:48:02+00:00 2026-06-18T03:48:02+00:00

My situation is this: Multiple threads must write concurrently to the same collection (add

  • 0

My situation is this:

Multiple threads must write concurrently to the same collection (add and addrange). Order of items is not an issue.
When all threads have completed (join) and im back on my main thread, then I need to read all the collected data fast in a foreach style, where no actual locking is needed since all threads are done.

In the “old days” I would probably use a readerwriter lock for this on a List, but with the new concurrent collections I wonder if not there is a better alternative. I just can’t figure out which as most concurrent collections seem to assume that the reader is also on a concurrent thread.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T03:48:07+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 3:48 am

    Order of items is not an issue. When all threads have completed (join) and im back on my main thread, then I need to read all the collected data

    You have not stated a requirement for a thread-safe collection at all. There’s no point in sharing a single collection since you never read at the same time you write. Nor does it matter that all writing happens to the same collection since order doesn’t matter. Nor should it matter since order would be random anyway.

    So just give each thread its own collection to fill, no locking required. And iterate them one by one afterwards, no locking required.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am running this program where I have multiple threads. Three threads are generating
I know there are multiple threads concerning this topic and having read them I
In this situation I have two models, Comment and Score. The relationship is defined
I have this situation: $(#button).toggle(function(){ $(#window).animate({top:'0%'},1000); },function(){ $(#window).animate({top:'-100%'},1000); }); but I need change it
I have this situation: http://jsfiddle.net/bRDgK/3/ In this situation I have a modal dialog with
The situation is this: I have a div with overflow auto containing a table.
The Situation (Ignore this it is boring): I have reports that I created using
I have this situation: { float foo[10]; for (int i = 0; i <
I have this situation where I want to display a list of Administration objects
The situation is this: I have a shared (DLL) build of Qt 4.5.1 and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.