Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4620990
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T02:38:11+00:00 2026-05-22T02:38:11+00:00

My team is currently debating this issue. The code in question is something along

  • 0

My team is currently debating this issue.

The code in question is something along the lines of

if (!myDictionary.ContainsKey(key))
{
    lock (_SyncObject)
    {
        if (!myDictionary.ContainsKey(key))
        {
            myDictionary.Add(key,value);
        }
    }
}

Some of the posts I’ve seen say that this may be a big NO NO (when using TryGetValue). Yet members of our team say it is ok since “ContainsKey” does not iterate on the key collection but checks if the key is contained via the hash code in O(1). Hence they claim there is no danger here.

I would like to get your honest opinions regarding this issue.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T02:38:11+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:38 am

    Don’t do this. It’s not safe.

    You could be calling ContainsKey from one thread while another thread calls Add. That’s simply not supported by Dictionary<TKey, TValue>. If Add needs to reallocate buckets etc, I can imagine you could get some very strange results, or an exception. It may have been written in such a way that you don’t see any nasty effects, but I wouldn’t like to rely on it.

    It’s one thing using double-checked locking for simple reads/writes to a field, although I’d still argue against it – it’s another to make calls to an API which has been explicitly described as not being safe for multiple concurrent calls.

    If you’re on .NET 4, ConcurrentDictionary is probably the way forward. Otherwise, just lock on every access.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently debating an issue with my dev team. They believes that empty
I'll try to make this as straight forward as possible. Currently our team has
Our team is currently using some ported code from an old architecture to a
First off, sorry for the cryptic question. My team is currently using Selenium 2.0rc3
We currently have an existing issue tracker, which the service management team utilise for
Currently my team and I are working with Code Igniter 1.7.3 and we are
Our team is sharing a Jenkins server with other teams, and this currently means
My team currently has a development web/database server and a live deployment web server
We (small team) currently have our Visual Studio projects on a network drive (no
My team is currently trying to automate the deployment of our .Net and PHP

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.