Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8480267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T19:14:59+00:00 2026-06-10T19:14:59+00:00

My thread TP-Processor27 is waiting, tells me a thread dump. Usually WAITING (on object

  • 0

My thread TP-Processor27 is waiting, tells me a thread dump.

Usually WAITING (on object monitor) lines are immediately followed by a waiting on <0x09c34480> or similar line. But not in the dump below. In such cases, can I know on which id is the wait?

"TP-Processor27" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00002aab91c88800 nid=0x58d7 in Object.wait() [0x0000000050d01000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
        at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
        at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
        at org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:1104)
        - locked <0x00002aaaccce0150> (a org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool$Latch)
        at org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedObjectPool.borrowObject(AbandonedObjectPool.java:88)
        at org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:115)
        at org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.getConnection(BasicDataSource.java:1053)
[...]

"TP-Processor28" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00002aab91c8a000 nid=0x58d8 runnable [0x0000000050e03000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
        at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
        at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
        at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218)
[...]
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T19:15:00+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 7:15 pm

    It seems that I saw a problem where there is actually no problem.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

thread.join() will call thread.wait() , but who and when notifies (either with thread.notify() or
Is there a way of Holding a thread in a State waiting for changes?
What is the best practice for writing a thread-safe context processor in Django? Say,
Thread A: a UI thread where the Gtkmm's message loop runs. Thread B: receives
Thread thread = new Thread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { try {
first thread i post here. I have been searching here for answers and almost
Main thread of application is doing some work. There also exists a timer, which
Can Thread.Abort interrupt a thread that is sleeping (using, say, Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromDays(40)) ? Or will
This thread didn't helped me. If I use $class_vars = get_class_vars(get_class($this)); foreach ($class_vars as
Taken from Microsoft documentation: By default, the thread pool has 250 worker threads per

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.