Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 158837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T10:45:08+00:00 2026-05-11T10:45:08+00:00

My understand has always been that when I declare an array on the stack

  • 0

My understand has always been that when I declare an array on the stack with a size that comes in as a variable or parameter, I should get an error.

However, I noticed that I do not get any error if I do not explicitly initialize the array (yes, it won’t be on the stack, but I’m wondering about the lack of error). For example, the following code does not compile because of array2:

#define N 30  void defineArrays(int n) {     int i,j;     int array1[N] = {};      int array2[n] = {};      for(i=0; i<N; ++i) array1[i] = 0;      for(j=0; j<n; ++j) array2[j] = 0; } 

But the following code compiles and runs, even when I send a real n from main:

#define N 30  void defineArrays(int n) {     int i,j;     int array1[N] = {};      int array2[n];      for(i=0; i<N; ++i) array1[i] = 0;      for(j=0; j<n; ++j) array2[j] = 0; } 

What I am missing here? Is it declaring array2 as a pointer? I’m using gcc

Update: Thanks for everyone who answered. The problem was indeed that my version of gcc was defaulting to C99 for some strange reason (or not so strange, maybe I’m just too old), and I incorrectly assumed that it defaults to C90 unless I tell it otherwise.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T10:45:09+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:45 am

    C99 introduced the ability to have variable length arrays which is now available in GCC (although it’s reported as not being totally standards compliant). In the second example, you appear to be taking advantage of that functionality.

    Link to GCC’s info about variable length arrays: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Length.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 214k
  • Answers 214k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer i think this is because you're opening/closing file within the… May 12, 2026 at 10:49 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I've had some success by using a different form of… May 12, 2026 at 10:49 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's much better to include the namespace in a using… May 12, 2026 at 10:49 pm

Related Questions

I've been playing around with Qt Creator 4.5 under Linux. My application builds just
I've been reading Illustrated C# 2008 by Daniel Solis (an excellent book, btw) and
I find myself very intrigued by the existence of a ConcurrentBag<T> class in the
I've been working with ASP.NET MVC and Javascript/jQuery a lot lately and I seem

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.