Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 857015
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T08:19:57+00:00 2026-05-15T08:19:57+00:00

My understanding is that C++ allows static const members to be defined inside a

  • 0

My understanding is that C++ allows static const members to be defined inside a class so long as it’s an integer type.

Why, then, does the following code give me a linker error?

#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>

class test
{
public:
    static const int N = 10;
};

int main()
{
    std::cout << test::N << "\n";
    std::min(9, test::N);
}

The error I get is:

test.cpp:(.text+0x130): undefined reference to `test::N'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Interestingly, if I comment out the call to std::min, the code compiles and links just fine (even though test::N is also referenced on the previous line).

Any idea as to what’s going on?

My compiler is gcc 4.4 on Linux.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T08:19:58+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 8:19 am

    For over a decade now C++ provides the constexpr keyword that handles this nonsense and much more. Declare your value as static constexpr and it won’t need a definition. The rest of this answer still applies to people consigned to hell permanently.


    My understanding is that C++ allows static const members to be defined inside a class so long as it’s an integer type.

    You are sort of correct. You are allowed to initialize static const integrals in the class declaration but that is not a definition.

    Interestingly, if I comment out the call to std::min, the code compiles and links just fine (even though test::N is also referenced on the previous line).

    Any idea as to what’s going on?

    std::min takes its parameters by const reference. If it took them by value you’d not have this problem but since you need a reference you also need a definition.

    Here’s chapter/verse:

    9.4.2/4 – If a static data member is of const integral or const enumeration type, its declaration in the class definition can specify a constant-initializer which shall be an integral constant expression (5.19). In that case, the member can appear in integral constant expressions. The member shall still be defined in a namespace scope if it is used in the program and the namespace scope definition shall not contain an initializer.

    See Chu’s answer for a possible workaround.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It is to my understanding that one should use a forward-class declaration in the
It is my understanding that the java.regex package does not have support for named
It is my understanding that page level caching does not take into account that,
It's my understanding that nulls are not indexable in DB2, so assuming we have
It's my understanding that common wisdom says to only use exceptions for truly exceptional
It is my understanding that I can test that a method call will occur
It is my understanding that the default behavior when creating a table in SQL
It's my understanding that StackOverflow (SO) was built using ASP.NET. What surprised me is
While it's my understanding that there's no fundamental reason a program written for 32-bit
I've got a c# WINDOWS Application that is multi-threaded. It is my understanding that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.