Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7780771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T19:00:44+00:00 2026-06-01T19:00:44+00:00

My usecase is as follows: I am using a typical SDK that comes with

  • 0

My usecase is as follows:

  • I am using a typical SDK that comes with Makefile based projects
  • I belive the linker is patched gcc. gcc –version gives me 4.3.4
  • SDK defines the linker script (lets call it Linker.ld)
  • Linker.ld includes LinkerMemMap.cfg, which defines the absolute addresses for various sections in the linked ELF image
  • SDK provides application templates based on Makefiles (GNU Make 3.81) and make itself
  • In the SDK provided Makefile template, when gcc is invoked the Linker.ld is provided with -T command line option, as follows:

gcc $(OBJS) -l$(Lib1) -l$(Lib2) -nostdlib -lgcc -L$(library_path) -g -msmall-mode -mconst-switch-tables -mas-mode -mno-initc -Wl,--start-group,--end-group,-T,$(PATH_TO_Linker.ld),--gc-sections -o$(OUTPUT).elf

My requirement is as follows:

  • I would like to use the sections as defined in Linker.ld and use the memory map as per LinkerMemMap.cfg however tweak a particular symbol(lets call it SYMBOL_RAM_START) defined in LinkerMemMap.cfg

What works:

  • I have tried in the makefile, prior to linking the final ELF image, copy the LinkerMemMap.cfg (which is included by Linker.ld) to the build directory and patch it to redefine SYMBOL_RAM_START. This does work as the linker searches for the linker scripts and the files included by the linker scripts in the current folder first.

What doesn’t:

  • Unfortunately our stakeholders think the above method is too risky and complex to understand. I would like to override the symbol value on the linker command line with something like below:

    1. gcc $(OBJS) -l$(Lib1) -l$(Lib2) -nostdlib -lgcc -L$(library_path) -g -msmall-mode -mconst-switch-tables -mas-mode -mno-initc -Wl,--start-group,--end-group,-T,$(PATH_TO_Linker.ld),--gc-sections,--defsym=SYMBOL_RAM_START=$(VALUE_TO_OVERRIDE) -o$(OUTPUT).elf

    2. gcc $(OBJS) -l$(Lib1) -l$(Lib2) -nostdlib -lgcc -L$(library_path) -g -msmall-mode -mconst-switch-tables -mas-mode -mno-initc -Wl,--start-group,--end-group,-T,$(PATH_TO_Linker.ld),--gc-sections --defsym=SYMBOL_RAM_START=$(VALUE_TO_OVERRIDE) -o$(OUTPUT).elf

    3. gcc $(OBJS) -l$(Lib1) -l$(Lib2) --defsym=SYMBOL_RAM_START=$(VALUE_TO_OVERRIDE) -nostdlib -lgcc -L$(library_path) -g -msmall-mode -mconst-switch-tables -mas-mode -mno-initc -Wl,--start-group,--end-group,-T,$(PATH_TO_Linker.ld),--gc-sections -o$(OUTPUT).elf

None of these seem to have any effect on the linked image created by the linker.

  • Can –defsym override the symbols defined by linkerscript specified using -T?
  • Could any of you please see what am I doing wrong here?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T19:00:45+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 7:00 pm

    While waiting for someone to respond, I did resolve the issue. There are few issues with the problem here and I thought of explaining my findings for someone who might do the same mistake.

    First of all Any options to be passed to the linker must be specified with -Xlinker or with -Wl. Hence both 2 and 3 won’t work in the above case. The corrected 2 and 3 would be as follows:

    1. Is correct already

    2. gcc $(OBJS) -l$(Lib1) -l$(Lib2) -nostdlib -lgcc -L$(library_path) -g -msmall-mode -mconst-switch-tables -mas-mode -mno-initc -Wl,--start-group,--end-group,-T,$(PATH_TO_Linker.ld),--gc-sections -Xlinker --defsym=SYMBOL_RAM_START=$(VALUE_TO_OVERRIDE) -o$(OUTPUT).elf

    3. gcc $(OBJS) -l$(Lib1) -l$(Lib2) -Xlinker --defsym=SYMBOL_RAM_START=$(VALUE_TO_OVERRIDE) -nostdlib -lgcc -L$(library_path) -g -msmall-mode -mconst-switch-tables -mas-mode -mno-initc -Wl,--start-group,--end-group,-T,$(PATH_TO_Linker.ld),--gc-sections -o$(OUTPUT).elf

    Now for the case of options 1 & 2 above, –defsym comes after linker script and SYMBOL_RAM_START was already defined by the linker script. It does override it. But the overriden value will not be used, because the sections have already been defined as the linker script has already been used.

    For the case of option 3 above, the SYMBOL_RAM_START was defined before the linker script was read by the linker. Hence when linker script is parsed, the value specified in the script overrides it.

    Solution:

    In order for this to work, the linker script will need to conditionally initialize the symbol SYMBOL_RAM_START, something like below:

    SYMBOL_RAM_START = DEFINED( SYMBOL_RAM_START ) ? SYMBOL_RAM_START : DEFAULT_VALUE ;

    Given the above in the linker script, when the SYMBOL_RAM_START was defined before the linker script is included (as shows in option 3 above) it did work. But in the end I had to patch the linker script.

    This solution doesn’t really override the symbol, but provides a way in which a symbol can be defined so that it can be overridden.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Usecase: The user makes font customizations to an object on the design surface, that
This might not have a major usecase in projects, but I was just trying
I am creating a simple Android widget with a typical usecase of having many
The use case is as follows : I have a script that runs a
My common usecase for my Struts2 application is that I have Actions that collect
My use-case is as follows: In activity A I call: startActivity(B); finish(); Now in
Usecase maintain a list of the last n visited URLs (where n is a
I have never seen the usecase for pre-increment and post-increment in actual code. The
I know that when a drag/drop operation is completed, upon receiving a MouseUp or
Can CouchDB's filtered replication be set to replicate not only the most recent version

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.