Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6688975
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T05:27:55+00:00 2026-05-26T05:27:55+00:00

My web application is using a SQL Server database that has around 2000 rows.

  • 0

My web application is using a SQL Server database that has around 2000 rows. I wanted to know if its better to load all the DB to the RAM (Store it in a static var) and query it using ASP.NET LINQ. I need it only for read operations. I think that the amount of RAM needed is not very high at all. I think it can speed up the application considerably.

I wanted to know if it’s a good option, instead of caching the data?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T05:27:56+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 5:27 am

    A database that small is already in memory on your server, no need to do it twice.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using SQL Server for my web application. How will I know that
I have a web application, which is using a SQL Server 2005 database. My
I am using the Entity Framework in a web application that utilizes SQL server
I need to write a web application using SQL Server 2005, asp.net, and ado.net.
What are the licences required for an asp.net (MVC) web application using sql server
I maintain a legacy ASP.Net Web application (using .Net 2.0 + SQL Server 2005
I'm implementing a web - based application using silverlight with an SQL Server DB
I have an asp.net web application written in C# using a SQL Server 2008
First some background: VB.NET 2005 Application that accesses a MS-SQL back-end, using multiple Web
I am creating a new database for a web site using SQL Server 2005

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.