Home/ Questions/Q 6131137
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-23T16:56:21+00:00

MyISAM Default engine No Transaction support Good for Heavy data reading Bad for write

  • 0

MyISAM

  • Default engine
  • No Transaction support
  • Good for Heavy data reading
  • Bad for write calls: table level locking

InnoDB

  • Transaction safe
  • Good for Heavy write calls: row level locking
  • Supports foreign keys referential integrity constraints

Is InnoDB bad for data reading??? What other storage engines should i be familar with?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    No, InnoDB is not “bad” for data reading; in fact, I tend to use it as a default engine for all of my tables. Transactions and true relational features outweigh any minor read-performance benefit that you might get from MyISAM (in my opinion).

    Edited to add: MyISAM is faster than InnoDB because it is simpler. But, unless you’re doing some really high-volume stuff or are using an ancient machine as your database server, you’re not likely to see a difference in daily operation.

    Other storage engines to be familiar with are Memory for really fast, non-persistent data storage and CSV which I will use on occasion as part of data export processes.

    This page has a comprehensive overview of MySQL Storage Engines.

    • 0