Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 279353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:01:31+00:00 2026-05-12T05:01:31+00:00

Myself and my group are horrendous at incrementing assembly version numbers and we frequently

  • 0

Myself and my group are horrendous at incrementing assembly version numbers and we frequently ship assemblies with 1.0.0.0 versions. Obviously, this causes a lot of headaches.

We’re getting a lot better with our practices via our CI platform and I’d really like to set it up to auto increment the values within the assemblyinfo.cs file so that the versions of our assemblies are auto updated with the code changes in that assembly.

I had previously setup (before we found Hudson) a way to increment the value through either msbuild or the command line (can’t remember), but with Hudson, that will update the SVN repository and trigger ANOTHER build. That would result in a slow infinite loop as Hudson polls SVN every hour.

Is having Hudson increment the version number a bad idea? What would be an alternative way to do it?

Ideally, my criteria for a solution would be one that:

  • Increments the build number in assemblyinfo.cs before a build
  • Only increments the build number in assemblies that have changed. This may not be possible as Hudson wipes out the project folder every time it does a build
  • Commits the changed assemblyinfo.cs into the code repository (currently VisualSVN)
  • Does not cause Hudson to trigger a new build the next time it scans for changes

Working this out in my head, I could easily come up with a solution to most of this through batch files / commands, but all of my ideas would cause Hudson to trigger a new build the next time it scans. I’m not looking for someone to do everything for me, just point me in the right direction, maybe a technique to get Hudson to ignore certain SVN commits, etc.

Everything I’ve found so far is just an article explaining how to get the version number automatically incremented, nothing takes into account a CI platform that could be spun into an infinite loop.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:01:31+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:01 am

    A simple alternative is to let the C# environment increment the assembly version for you by setting the version attribute to major.minor.* (as described in the AssemblyInfo file template.)

    You may be looking for a more comprehensive solution, though.

    EDIT (Response to the question in a comment):

    From AssemblyInfo.cs:

    // Version information for an assembly consists of the following four values:
    //
    //      Major Version
    //      Minor Version 
    //      Build Number
    //      Revision
    //
    // You can specify all the values or you can default the Build and Revision Numbers 
    // by using the '*' as shown below:
    // [assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.0.*")]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From time to time, I find myself using the same group of statements and
So I recently found myself writing a loop similar to this one: var headers
I installed Edgewall Trac0.12.3 and added myself to the administrators group. In the administration
I frequently find myself using setlocal within cmd.exe to avoid polluting the environment variable
I'm guessing that this post will hit a different group of people who seem
I often find myself adding expressions in the group by clause that I am
I find myself in this position occasionally, and I'm sure there is a better
I find myself using the Open Group's base specifications quite a bit when I
Can someone convert this query to linq2sql for me? Trying to teach myself linq
I frequently find myself having a need to create a class as a container

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.