nmap can’t do the work. I have checked that.
ps: I just use the basic nmap function(nmap host).
Oh, My god. Trust me i don’t plan to do bad things. I am just curious! Please don’t do -1!
update, use command: nmap -v -p1-65535 -sV
Scanning hidethehostaddress [2 ports]
Completed Ping Scan at 21:38, 0.00s elapsed (1 total hosts)
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 21:38
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 21:38, 0.00s elapsed
Initiating Connect Scan at 21:38
Scanning hidethehostaddress [65535 ports]
Connect Scan Timing: About 11.88% done; ETC: 21:43 (0:03:50 remaining)
Connect Scan Timing: About 32.96% done; ETC: 21:41 (0:02:04 remaining)
Completed Connect Scan at 21:40, 83.98s elapsed (65535 total ports)
Initiating Service scan at 21:40
Nmap scan report for hidethehostaddress
Host is up (0.080s latency).
Not shown: 65532 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
23/tcp closed telnet
80/tcp closed http
443/tcp closed https
Read data files from: /usr/share/nmap
Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org /submit/ .
It can: