Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 39615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:53:35+00:00 2026-05-10T14:53:35+00:00

No, this is not a question about generics. I have a Factory pattern with

  • 0

No, this is not a question about generics.

I have a Factory pattern with several classes with internal constructors (I don’t want them being instantiated if not through the factory).

My problem is that CreateInstance fails with a ‘No parameterless constructor defined for this object’ error unless I pass ‘true’ on the non-public parameter.

Example

// Fails Activator.CreateInstance(type);  // Works Activator.CreateInstance(type, true); 

I wanted to make the factory generic to make it a little simpler, like this:

public class GenericFactory<T> where T : MyAbstractType {     public static T GetInstance()     {         return Activator.CreateInstance<T>();     } } 

However, I was unable to find how to pass that ‘true’ parameter for it to accept non-public constructors (internal).

Did I miss something or it isn’t possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:53:36+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:53 pm

    To get around this, couldnt you just alter your usage as such:

    public class GenericFactory<T> where T : MyAbstractType {     public static T GetInstance()     {         return Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T), true);     } } 

    Your factory method will still be generic, but the call to the activator will not use the generic overload. But you should still achieve the same results.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 68k
  • Answers 68k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer The biggest problem I see is the obvious fact that… May 11, 2026 at 12:05 pm
  • added an answer My experience with the Reorder List in the Ajax Control… May 11, 2026 at 12:05 pm
  • added an answer I have recently seen this very idea of abstraction implemented… May 11, 2026 at 12:05 pm

Related Questions

No, this is not a question about generics. I have a Factory pattern with
I know there is no such thing as a dumb question but this is:
I have no idea why this is happening. I have some very straightforward code,
This is probably a no brainer but... I've just opened a solution in VS2008
(This is no homework and no work issue. It's just my personal interest/occupation and
This is supposed to be a no brainer but I still can’t figure it
This is quite a controversial topic, and before you say no, is it really,
EDIT: Modified title and added update. UPDATE : We no longer believe this is
Apparently using the URL is no good - why is this the case, and
I usually get so confused with UML and this situation is no different. Let's

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.