Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8569583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T18:22:10+00:00 2026-06-11T18:22:10+00:00

normal way: for x in myList: myFunc(x) you must use a variable x use

  • 0

normal way:

for x in myList:
    myFunc(x)

you must use a variable x

use

map(myFunc,myList)

and in fact you must use this to make above work

list(map(myFunc,myList))

that would build a list,i don’t need to build a list

maybe some one would suggest me doing this

def func(l):
   for x in l:
        ....

that is another topic

is there something like this?

every(func,myList)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T18:22:11+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 6:22 pm

    The ‘normal way’ is definitely the best way, although itertools does offer the consume recipe for whatever reason you might need it:

    import collections
    from itertools import islice
    
    def consume(iterator, n):
        "Advance the iterator n-steps ahead. If n is none, consume entirely."
        # Use functions that consume iterators at C speed.
        if n is None:
            # feed the entire iterator into a zero-length deque
            collections.deque(iterator, maxlen=0)
        else:
            # advance to the empty slice starting at position n
            next(islice(iterator, n, n), None)
    

    This could be used like:

    consume(imap(func, my_list), None) # On python 3 use map
    

    This function performs the fastest as it avoids python for loop overhead by using functions which run on the C side.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is the normal way to do this to just make 2 cols in my
The normal way that I work is to have a small eshell buffer and
Is it normal to have tests that are way bigger than the actual code
What is the most concise way of converting a java.util.List into a normal JavaFX
The normal JSON approach looks something like this: { list: [ { header1: some
Normal way looks like this: pStmt = conn.prepareStatement(SELECT DETAILS FROM PROGRAM_HISTORY WHERE id =
The normal way to do this would be: var resultSelect = document.getElementById(resultSelect); resultSelect.size =
I have a DLL >> System.Data.SQLite.dll To use it in a normal way >
I’m writing a Dashcode app that contains a list. I’d like to populate this
I know that the normal way to shuffle results with SQL Server is to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.