Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Normally I have been using Secure | Signing | Sealing flags to pull back a directory entry and search.
If I wanted to use SecureSocketsLayer instead, should I also specify any of those flags (Secure | Signing | Sealing) with it, or does the SSL flag encompass full encryption/signing and can be used alone?
I have read http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.directoryservices.authenticationtypes.aspx but the description doesn’t make it fully clear.
SecureSocketsLayer requires a user cert – it’s mutual auth, essentially. It’s not the same as Secure | Signing | Sealing. This gets you Kerberos/NTLM authenticated and encrypted traffic. If you don’t need mutual auth, I would leave it as-is, but, if you do, you can attach it as a fourth flag.