Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 537379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:55:15+00:00 2026-05-13T09:55:15+00:00

Normally I love to keep my HTML code clean, semantic and free from either

  • 0

Normally I love to keep my HTML code clean, semantic and free from either Javascript or CSS. I include my .JS and .CSS files at the top, and layer functionality on top of the DOM elements.

The positives of this are:

  • Architectural separation of concerns
  • Graceful degradation where Javascript or CSS isn’t supported
  • Search-engine friendliness

There is one major negative:

  • Performance problems in IE 6

Because all the events are attached to the elements through Javascript code, which accesses the DOM, performance in IE suffers.

This is especially so when using jQuery (which happens to be my favorite Javascript framework).

So it seems like I have two choices: either keep the code nice and neat, and have IE 6 users (around 20% of the user-base) complain, or “de-normalize” the code to improve IE 6 performance.

Is there a “middle way” in this situation? Or am I doomed?


Note: I’m not saying that my performance problems are caused by having Javascript in a separate file.

I can achieve wonderful performance in IE while keeping it in a separate file.

The problem is, I still have to put the actual event handlers into ‘onclick’ attributes in the HTML. For example:

<span onclick="doSomething()">More...</span>

It would be much nicer if I could just write:

<span id="more-button">More...</span>

And then assign it separately, in Javascript, with the following:

$("#more-button").click(doSomething);

Unfortunately, it seems this is bad for IE6 performance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:55:15+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:55 am

    In a talk available at YUI Theater, Joseph Smarr talks about performance and states the opinion that it is ok to have onmousedown handlers and the like in your code for performance reasons instead of finding the DOM element and then attaching the event handler. However, I do not know any measures by which that speeds up things. Other techniques for unobtrusive performance boosts are (EIDT: note that they are browser independent, hence not restricted to IE):

    • Use onmousedown instead of onclick. Smarr says there is a 100ms or so period between the firing of the two events.
    • For perceived performance: Give instant visual feedback by using window.setTimeout(visualFeedback, 0). That lets the browser draw some graphical change instantly, letting the user know that something is happening.
    • When you have to traverse the DOM, cache intermediate results in a variable to reuse them (guess you know that one).

    There is also a demo that shows the benefit of the first two points. The button at the top uses onclick and normal execution, the one below uses onmousedown and setTimeout(func, 0).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Normally the XML files I have to parse are like this: <row id=1> <title>widget<title>
Normally we use window.location.href=/index.php?querystring; in javascript. Is there a way to send the querystring
Normally IN is used with one value: SELECT * FROM data WHERE f1 IN
I am developing VAADIN using Db4O for storage. Normally, I love the fact that
I have a Java server process that I normally run in either Windows batch
Normally, if my code has any performance issue, I will follow the below steps
Normally, in order to remove non-word characters from a String the replaceAll method can
Normally you make a call to a service, it blocks until a thread in
Normally, you don't actually edit a file in vim. If you run vim foo
Normally all the document related to an iOS application are stored in a document

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.