Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1067101
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:06:37+00:00 2026-05-16T20:06:37+00:00

Normally someone would just go and grab Boost’s Function Output Iterator but I’m not

  • 0

Normally someone would just go and grab Boost’s Function Output Iterator but I’m not allowed to use Boost at work. That said, I just want to use the copy function to traverse a collection, call a function on each item, take the output of that function, and finally push_back it onto another collection. I’ve written some code:

#include <iterator>
using std::iterator;
using std::output_iterator_tag;

template<typename Container, typename Function>
struct Back_Transform_Iterator : public iterator<output_iterator_tag,void,void,void,void>{
    explicit Back_Transform_Iterator(Container &_container, const Function &_function) 
        : m_Container(_container),
        m_Function(_function){}

    Back_Transform_Iterator<Container,Function>& operator= (const typename Function::argument_type &value){ 
      m_Container.push_back( m_Function( value ) );

      return *this; 
    }

    Back_Transform_Iterator<Container,Function>& operator* (){ return *this; }
    Back_Transform_Iterator<Container,Function>& operator++ (){ return *this; }
    Back_Transform_Iterator<Container,Function> operator++ (int){ return *this; }

    typedef Container container_type;

private:
    Container   &m_Container;
    Function    m_Function;
};

template<typename C, typename F>
Back_Transform_Iterator<C,F> back_transform_inserter(C &_container, F &_unary_function){
    return Back_Transform_Iterator<C,F>( _container, _unary_function );
}

but… I’m getting compilation problems. Fairly certain it’s to do with the operator*() call. I have no idea how to effectively dereference the container’s objects so that they object the function’s effects. Error:

error C2582: 'operator =' function is unavailable in 'Back_Transform_Iterator<Container,Function>'

the items I’m iterating over are not mutable. Anyone know how to tackle this issue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:06:38+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:06 pm

    You can use transform instead:

    transform(src.begin(), src.end(), back_inserter(container), func);
    

    Note that const applied on a reference type is a no-op. So if argument_type is T&, then saying const argument_type does not yield back const T& but T& again. So if your source items are constant you would try to bind them to the non-const reference parameter of operator= in case that argument_type is a reference:

    typedef int &intr;
    const intr& a = 0; // fails - "const" is ignored!
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 545k
  • Answers 545k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Well, start off by thinking of which bits of data… May 17, 2026 at 9:17 am
  • added an answer For this task it is a good idea to use… May 17, 2026 at 9:15 am
  • added an answer This is exactly how the Skyhook database (built into many… May 17, 2026 at 9:15 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.