Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8694827
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T00:52:44+00:00 2026-06-13T00:52:44+00:00

Normally, this would be optimised to not involve copying the large value (since a

  • 0

Normally, this would be optimised to not involve copying the large value (since a std::vector has move semantics enabled):

std::vector<int> makeABigThing(){
    std::vector<int> large_thing(1000, 0);
    return large_thing;
}

Can this also be optimised in the same way if the function is a virtual method:

struct Foo{
    virtual std::vector<int> makeABigThing(){
        std::vector<int> large_thing(1000, 0);
        return large_thing;
    }
};

i.e., do move semantics work with even when the called function is selected at runtime?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T00:52:45+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 12:52 am

    Whether the function is static or dynamically resolved does not affect the possibility of moving the result.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This kind of code would normally work in PHP, but since the scope is
Normally I would just do this. $str = preg_replace('#(\d+)#', ' $1 ', $str); If
I have this code that where I would normally use one line: if (tableView
I normally do most of this work in Excel 2007, but I do not
I'm trying to add two Datatriggers to my WPF Window. Normally, this would work
Has anyone got any tips for this problem i'm facing. Its not complex, but
Normally, this would be incredibly easy with tables, but everyone says tables are bad
Normally this would be something like: glutAddMenuEntry(-, <opid>); But it doesn't work. After looking
Normaly i would do a delete * from XXX but on this table thats
my jQuery skills are pretty good normally but this is driving me mad! It's

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.