Home/ Questions/Q 7735419
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-01T07:29:51+00:00

Normally when I want to query large result set using Mysql I write this

  • 0

Normally when I want to query large result set using Mysql I write this (taken from this answer):

stmt = conn.createStatement(java.sql.ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY, java.sql.ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
stmt.setFetchSize(Integer.MIN_VALUE);

Now I’m using jOOQ 2.0.5 and I can’t achieve the same result.

I’ve tried calling fetchLazy with no luck, it loads the entire result set in memory:

Cursor<Record> result = query.fetchLazy(Integer.MIN_VALUE);

As a workaround I can get the sql query using query.getSQL() and create a suitable Statement to execute it.

Is there another way to have stream result sets using jOOQ?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    According to the JDBC specs, Integer.MIN_VALUE is not a valid argument for the Statement.setFetchSize() method:

    Gives the JDBC driver a hint as to the number of rows that should be fetched from the database when more rows are needed for ResultSet objects genrated by this Statement. If the value specified is zero, then the hint is ignored. The default value is zero.

    Parameters:

    rows the number of rows to fetch

    Throws:
    SQLException – if a database access error occurs, this method is called on a closed Statement or the condition rows >= 0 is not satisfied.

    Implementations may throw a SQLException for negative fetch sizes. Hence, jOOQ doesn’t accept parameters less than 0. You should try using a fetch size of 1 instead. In the mean time, the next release of jOOQ might be able to break the JDBC standard, to support this documented MySQL feature
    :

    https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/1263 (implemented in jOOQ 2.2.0)

    • 0