Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4321768
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T08:47:18+00:00 2026-05-21T08:47:18+00:00

Note on pri from ps man page: pri PRI priority of the process. Higher

  • 0

Note on pri from ps man page:

“pri PRI priority of the process. Higher number means lower priority”

Consider PID 26073 here

$ renice +15 26073 


26073: old priority 5, new priority 15 # I am making this process more nice 

$ ps -t 1 -o pid,ppid,%cpu,stat,cmd,bsdstart,time,pri

  PID  PPID %CPU  STAT CMD      START     TIME PRI
 9115 18136  0.0   Ss   bash     17:10 00:00:01  19
26073  9115 12.0   RN+  p4 sync  19:06 00:02:56   4

STAT = RN+ which means : Running , low-prio ( nice to others), foreground. PRI=4 (1)

$ sudo renice -10 26073 

26073: old priority 15, new priority -10 # I am making this process less nice

 $ ps -t 1 -o pid,ppid,%cpu,stat,cmd,bsdstart,time,pri

  PID  PPID %CPU STAT CMD       START     TIME PRI
 9115 18136  0.0  Ss   bash     17:10 00:00:01  19
26073  9115 12.0  S<+  p4 sync  19:06 00:03:15  29

STAT = S<+ which means : Interruptible sleep , high-prio ( not nice to others), foreground. PRI=29 (2)

In case 2 the process priority increased or to say it another way the process became higher priority.

But this contradicts what definition of pri says from man page ( that higher number means lower priority)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T08:47:19+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:47 am

    You are being confused by PRI (immediate priority) vs. NICE (the assigned priority). PRI often gets a boost (i.e. lower value) when a process is being restarted after blocking on I/O, and conversely is lowered (higher value) if it uses up its scheduler-assigned time slot without blocking, at least with the standard scheduler. Many systems have alternative schedulers with different behaviors, but in all cases PRI is the actual current priority that the scheduler has assigned; this value is influenced by, but not defined by, the assigned “niceness”.

    Reference on Linux’s priority management here: http://oreilly.com/catalog/linuxkernel/chapter/ch10.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

NOTE: This is a followup to my question here. I have a program that
NOTE: This is an old question and the answers here no longer works (since
NOTE: I have read Routing From the Inside Out AND the Engine Yard blog
Note: It was tough deciding whether this belonged here or ServerFault, but it seemed
(Note: these two questions are similar, but more specific to ASP.Net) Consider a typical
(NOTE: I've updated this question from the initial inquiry about child containers towards creating
Note: I changed the example from when I first posted. My first example was
{NOTE}: Visual Studio Dos support .ipp file. The problem here is more manual inefficiency
Note : Part of a series: C#: Accessing form members from another class and
(Note: the data here is a made up example since I can't post the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.