Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 604317
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:01:30+00:00 2026-05-13T17:01:30+00:00

Note that the following are examples of the rare cases where dotNet reflector does

  • 0

Note that the following are examples of the rare cases where dotNet reflector does not disassemble correctly. In the vast majority of cases it works perfectly, and I am not suggesting this is necessarily a bug in reflector. It may be a result of protection or obfuscation or unmanaged code on the assemblies in question.

I try to disassemble System.Web.UI.WebControls.XmlHierarchicalEnumerable in dotnet reflector. The generics seems all screwed up, eg:

// Nested Types
[CompilerGenerated]
private sealed class GetEnumerator>d__0 : IEnumerator<object>, 
    IEnumerator, IDisposable
{
    // Fields
    private int <>1__state;
    private object <>2__current;
    public XmlHierarchicalEnumerable <>4__this;
    public IEnumerator <>7__wrap2;
    public IDisposable <>7__wrap3;
    public XmlNode <node>5__1;

In other assemblies I sometimes get little squares (I know these usually stand for ‘unknown symbol’) in place of class names, eg:

    dictionary1.Add("autopostbackonselect", 0x34);
    ᜀ.ᜌ = dictionary1;
}

if (ᜀ.ᜌ.TryGetValue(key, out num))
{
    switch (num)

What gives ? Anyone know ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:01:31+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:01 pm

    In the first example, this is completely expected. These classes are used for the implementation of IEnumerable<T> when using the yield return statements. It generates classes which store the state and get the new values when MoveNext is called on the IEnumerator<T> instance output by the IEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator implementation (you will note they are one in the same).

    It should be noted that what you are seeing is completely legal naming syntax from a CLR perspective. From a C# perspective though, it is not legal. However, since these classes are internal and you will never need access to them directly (only through interface implmentations), there is no need for them to be legal C# names.

    As for the second, I haven’t seen that behavior, it’s possible that the assembly is obfuscated, but I’ve not seen that in .NET in any version. If you clarify the assemblies (.NET framework or not) in which version of the .NET framework you are looking at, as well as what version of reflector you are using, it would help.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following examples in c++, the first works as expected the second
In the following examples: public class RowData { public object[] Values; } public class
Consider the following code which is typcial of many ChannelFactory examples: WSHttpBinding myBinding =
My style of coding includes the following idiom: class Derived : public Base {
Shred documentation says shred is not guaranteed to be effective (See bottom). So if
I've done the following tests with JSON requests sent to an ASP.NET 2.0 ASMX
I've read before here on SO ( EDIT: Incremental Checksums ) that there are
I created two Hello World processes to give the subProcess nodes a whirl. I'm
We have a local database of our products without the price. To get the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.