Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7643991
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T09:34:49+00:00 2026-05-31T09:34:49+00:00

NOTE: This appears to be a limit in the javac program. I have Java

  • 0

NOTE: This appears to be a limit in the “javac” program.

I have Java 6 code that needs to be built for a Java 5 JVM. My previous work with the javac ant target (both with the JDK compiler and with ecj) led me to believe that it would simply be a matter of setting source and target for javac. Hence this pom.xml fragment:

<plugin>
    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
    <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
    <version>2.3.2</version>
    <configuration>
        <source>1.6</source>
        <target>1.5</target>
    </configuration>
</plugin>

which works as expected from within Eclipse 3.7 with Maven support. Unfortunately, running Maven directly from the command line give me

javac: source release 1.6 requires target release 1.6

which is the same as generated by javac -source 1.6 -target 1.5. To clarify, this is the official OpenJDK 6 for Ubuntu

x@JENKINS:~$ javac -version
javac 1.6.0_20
x@JENKINS:~$ javac -source 1.6 -target 1.5
javac: source release 1.6 requires target release 1.6
x@JENKINS:~$

The official Oracle Java 7 JDK for Windows show the same behavior.

Note: I do not want to build against Java 5 libraries or anything. Just that the active javac generates Java 5 compatible bytecode.

How do I get what I want while still being compatible with the Eclipse Maven plugin?

(EDIT: In addition to the @Override I also want to compile against the JAX-WS libraries in Java 6 when used, but still generated Java 5 byte code – I can then add the JAX-WS libraries deliberately in the web container when deploying to a Java 5 installation)


EDIT: It turns out that maven-compiler-plugin can be told to use another compiler, and the Eclipse compiler can do this:

        <plugin>
            <!-- Using the eclipse compiler allows for different source and target, 
                which is a good thing (outweighing that this is a rarely used combination, 
                and most people use javac) This should also allow us to run maven builds 
                on a JRE and not a JDK. -->

            <!-- Note that initial experiments with an earlier version of maven-compiler-plugin 
                showed that the eclipse compiler bundled with that gave incorrect lines in 
                the debug information. By using a newer version of the plexus-compiler-eclipse 
                plugin this is hopefully less of an issue. If not we must also bundle a newer 
                version of the eclipse compiler itself. -->

            <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
            <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
            <version>3.0</version>
            <configuration>
                <source>1.6</source>
                <target>1.5</target>
                <debug>true</debug>
                <optimize>false</optimize>
                <fork>true</fork>
                <compilerId>eclipse</compilerId>
            </configuration>
            <dependencies>
                <dependency>
                    <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
                    <artifactId>plexus-compiler-eclipse</artifactId>
                    <version>2.1</version>
                </dependency>
            </dependencies>
        </plugin>

which compiles the class to Java 1.5 bytecode without complaints. This is also supported “out of the box” for m2e for Eclipse Java EE 4.2.2.

EDIT: I found that of all things the javadoc tool dislikes the output from the Eclipse compiler.

EDIT 2015-06-28: I did a quick test recently and the latest ecj (corresponding to Eclipse 4.4) worked fine with javadoc.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T09:34:50+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 9:34 am

    The limitation is in javac. The solution is to tell maven to use another compiler. See question for details.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Note: This issue appears to be limited to SQL Server 2005 SP2 I have
Note: this appears to have been fixed in Roslyn This question arose when writing
(Note: This is for MySQL's SQL, not SQL Server.) I have a database column
Note: This is the opposite direction to most similar questions! I have an iPhone
Note: This is no longer an issue, the .NET 4 built-in DataGrid solves this
It appears this code will request the file in Chrome and IE but not
I have a change password page that needs to hash any passwords entered on
Note: This is question to which I have already found an answer. It seems
i want to create a virtual monitor. The way this would work is that
Google chrome (the tab) will become unresponsive when opening this page. Note that this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.