Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9226753
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T04:54:20+00:00 2026-06-18T04:54:20+00:00

Note:: This question has to do with memory visibility and not public, private etc.

  • 0

Note:: This question has to do with memory visibility and not “public”, “private” etc.

Lets say I had the following class:

public class Data {
    public final byte[] array;
    public final int offset, length;
    public Data(byte[] array, int offset, int length) {...}
    ...
}

(The elements in the above array can change through methods not shown.)

Now suppose I had a queue with the given data in another class:

final ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Data> queue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();

Now suppose i have the following code in the class with the queue:

Data data = queue.poll();
... code for reading the elements in the data object.

My question is: Are the elements in the array that were set BEFORE the polling of the queue guaranteed to be visible to the thread that polled the data from the queue?

I understand that the elements set after the polling of the queue will not be visible to the reader, I am only interested in the elements set before the polling of the queue.

If not, it is my understanding that the following code put after calling the poll method will ensure the visibility of the array

data = new Data(data.array, data.offset, data.length);

because object construction ensures the full visibility of the object’s fields. Is this correct?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T04:54:21+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 4:54 am

    The documentation says:

    The methods of all classes in java.util.concurrent and its subpackages extend these guarantees to higher-level synchronization. In particular:

    Actions in a thread prior to placing an object into any concurrent collection happen-before actions subsequent to the access or removal of that element from the collection in another thread.

    so yes, you’re guaranteed to see the values in the array that have been set prior to storing the object into the queue. (I’m assuming you don’t modify te array once after it has been stored into the queue here).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Note: this question has nothing to do with Knockout.js, but it's about the selectedOptions
Note: This question has broadened in scope from previous revisions. I have tried to
Note: This is similar to this question but it is not the same. I
Please note this question related to performance only. Lets skip design guidelines, philosophy, compatibility,
(note that this question is not about CAS, it's about the May fail spuriously
Note : This question has been re-asked with a summary of all debugging attempts
Note: This question has been renamed and reduced to make it more focused and
(Note: My question has very similar concerns as the person who asked this question
Note this question was originally posted in 2009, before C++11 was ratified and before
Note: This question is related to an advice rather than an issue. I would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.