Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3223080
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:03:55+00:00 2026-05-17T16:03:55+00:00

Now, with EJB 3.1, we can find the javax.ejb.Singleton annocation that can ensure that

  • 0

Now, with EJB 3.1, we can find the javax.ejb.Singleton annocation that can ensure that this bean is going to be singleton.

Is there a way that i can ensure singleton using stateless beans in EJB 3.0 with some modifications in my code (use of the keyword static, or other way to do that….)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:03:56+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:03 pm

    If you’re able to limit your @Stateless bean pool size to exactly 1, then you can get pretty close to an @Singleton.

    The effect would be like having an @Singleton that uses @Lock(WRITE) for all calls (i.e. no concurrency) and does not eagerly startup via @Startup (it will start on first access).

    You might still be able to get the effect of @Startup if your platform has the option to eagerly fill @Stateless bean pools.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am not able to find a way to set TransactionIsolation in ejb. Can
I have managed bean/backing bean and I inject there (with @EJB) session bean. Now
Now that it's clear what a metaclass is , there is an associated concept
Obviously using stateless EJB beans in an entity bean smells, but please consider a
This question would not have existed if AspectJ worked the same way as EJB
EJB 3.1 Session Bean: import javax.ejb.*; public class FooException extends EJBException { } @Stateless
Now that most of the major browsers support full page zoom (at present, the
Now that I know C++ I want to get into desktop application that have
Now that LINQ to SQL is a little more mature, I'd like to know
Now that .NET v3.5 SP1 has been released (along with VS2008 SP1), we now

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.