Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8729011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T08:45:18+00:00 2026-06-13T08:45:18+00:00

object o = new { foo = 1 }; Is there any other way

  • 0
object o = new { foo = 1 };

Is there any other way to add properties to the object?

Neither o["foo"] = 1 nor o.foo = 1 seems to be working.

And if i type

var o = new { foo = 1 };

Why is the type of var an “AnonomuysType” and not object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T08:45:19+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:45 am

    You can’t just add properties to compiled types. The only time that will work as properties (well, kind-of) is if you are using the dynamic API, and the object is something that supports dynamic properties, for example:

    dynamic obj = new ExpandoObject();
    obj.Foo = 123;
    obj.Bar = "abc";
    

    however, those values are not available via reflection. An easier approach may be something that behaves as a dictionary:

    var obj = new Dictionary<string,object>();
    obj["Foo"] = 123;
    obj["Bar"] = "abc";
    

    there are more discoverable, via the dictionary API. Re your final question: when you do:

    var o = new { foo = 1 };
    

    the new { foo = 1 } causes the compiler to generate an anonymous type, which is a regular C# class with read-only properties and an unpronounceable name. This can be referred to as object (it is a regular class, after all), but when you use var the compiler uses the known type (with the horrible name), which gives you access to the properties (.foo in this case).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Apart from eval(`o = new ${className}(${args.join(", ")})`) , is there any other way to
Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but is there any other way to access
assuming x is an object... Is there any benefit of doing: if (typeof x.foo
I can't think of any situation where std::shared_ptr<Object> obj(new Object(foo, 1)); would be preferred
After creating a new object (Foo), I set the key (BarId) for an EntityRef
When you instantiate a new object by calling constructor, i.e. Foo bar = new
String s; /*code*/ s = foo; Is a whole new object being created, since
object[] objArray = new object[]{blah, 4, whatever}; foreach(var value in objArray) vs. foreach(object value
[Bindable]public var headingData1:Object = new Object(); <mx:HTTPService id=srv url=components.xml resultFormat=object result=getHeadings(event);/> private function getHeadings(evt:ResultEvent):void{
I have seen objects being created this way: const obj = new Foo; But

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.