Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3342576
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T00:51:18+00:00 2026-05-18T00:51:18+00:00

Objective: Convert an overgrown Excel sheet into an Access database, but maintain a front-end

  • 0

Objective: Convert an overgrown Excel sheet into an Access database, but maintain a front-end that is familiar and easy to use.

There are several aspects to this, but the one I’m stuck on is one of the input forms. I’m not going to clutter this question with the back-end implementation that I have already tried because I’m open to changing it. Currently, an Excel spreadsheet is used to input employee hour allocations to various tasks. It looks something like the following.

Employee    | Task   | 10/03/10 | 10/10/10 | 10/17/10 | 10/24/10 | ... | 12/26/11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doe, John   | Code   |      16  |      16  |       20 |       20 | ... |       40
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smith, Jane | Code   |      32  |      32  |       16 |       32 | ... |       32
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doe, John   | Test   |      24  |      24  |       20 |       20 | ... |        0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smith, Jane | Test   |       0  |       0  |       16 |        0 | ... |        0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smith, Jane | QA     |       8  |       8  |        8 |        8 | ... |        8      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               TOTAL |      80  |      80  |       80 |       80 | ... |       80

Note that there are fifteen months of data on the sheet and that employee allocations are entered for each week of those fifteen months. Currently, at the end of the fifteen months, a new sheet is created, but the database should maintain this data for historical purposes.

Does anyone have any ideas on how to create an editable form/datasheet that has the same look and feel? If not, how about an alternative solution that still provides the user a quick glance at all fifteen months and allows easy editing of the data? What would the back-end tables look like for your proposed solution?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T00:51:18+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 12:51 am

    This is a classic de-normalization problem.

    To produce an editable spread-sheet like view of your database you’ll need a table with 66 columns (the two identifying columns and 64 weekly integer columns). The question is whether you want the permanent storage of the data to use this table, or to use a normalized table with four columns (the two identifiers, the week-starting date, and the integer hours value).

    I would give serious consideration to storing the data in the normalized form, then converting (using a temporary table) into the denormalized form, allowing the user to print/edit the data, and then converting back to normal form.

    Using this technique you get the following benefits:

    1. The ability to support rolling windows into the data (with 66 columns, you will see a specified 15 month period, and no other). With a rolling window you can show them last month and the next 14 months, or whatever.

    2. It will be substantially easier to do things like check peoples total hours per month, or compare the hours spent in testing vs QA for an arbitrary range of dates.

    Of course, you have to write the code to translate between normal and denormal form, but that should be pretty straightforward.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.