Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 950267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:32:15+00:00 2026-05-15T23:32:15+00:00

Obviously, I’m not an expert in C#. I would like to simplify this code

  • 0

Obviously, I’m not an expert in C#. I would like to simplify this code by using an anonymous handler, or maybe a lambda, not sure. ValueHasChanged is a PropertyChangedCallback used when a dp is changed, it ensures the new object will be monitored for update, so that both changes and updates will be processed using the same code: ProcessNewValue. The pity here is to create a second handler ValueHasBeenUpdated only to call the same method. Is there a possibility to remove the definition of ValueHasBeenUpdated? Thanks.

private static void ValueHasChanged(
    DependencyObject sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args) {

    // get instance
    MyClass1 instance = sender as MyClass1;

    // unregister on old object
    if (args.OldValue != null) (args.OldValue as MyClass2).PropertyChanged -=
        instance.ValueHasBeenUpdated;
    // register for updates on new object
    if (args.NewValue != null) (args.NewValue as MyClass2).PropertyChanged +=
        instance.ValueHasBeenUpdated;

    // process new value anyway
    instance.ProcessNewValue();
}

// value has been updated
private void ValueHasBeenUpdated(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e) {

    // just call the actual method that will process it, not elegant...
    ProcessNewValue();
}

// process any new or updated object
private void ProcessNewValue() {...}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:32:16+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:32 pm

    Nothing wrong with doing what you’ve done. It may seem “inelegant,” but it is readable. Readability is more important than elegance. There may be other solutions, but they will all be more confusing for other coders to understand (or for you to understand 6 months from now).

    Stick with what you’ve got.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Obviously the point of using named constants over magic numbers is for code clarity
Obviously it's early days, I do not know whether this is information that is
Obviously I'd like to not have to install an Oracle client (other than simply
I obviously don't think it would work as it is. Its more like, does
Obviously the reader doesn't like this format incoming from the response XML. Wondering if
Obviously this is just a fraction of the code. printf(Please enter a positive number
Obviously you can't create a member of a class like this string name =
Obviously I have my own opinion and way of doing this, but I would
Obviously , I'm new to Python. I would like to use StringIO in my
Obviously, sets do not have any kind of ordering, so I cannot expect any

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.