Home/ Questions/Q 65325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T18:55:44+00:00

[ Of course, the question is not restricted to a specific friend implementation, feel

  • 0

[Of course, the question is not restricted to a specific ‘friend’ implementation, feel free though to point out implementation specifics if relevant]

Reading through the unanswered questions, I stumbled upon the InternalsVisibleTo attribute:

Specifies that types that are ordinarily visible only within the current assembly are visible to another assembly.

The C# Programming Guide on MSDN has a section Friend Assemblies describing how to use the attribute to allow the use of internal methods and types to another assembly.

I’m wondering whether it would be a Good Idea to use this to create a ‘hidden’ interface for instrumenting a library for use by the unit testing assembly. It seems to increase coupling massively in both directions (testing code in the production assembly, intimate internal knowledge about the production assembly in testing code), but on the other hand it might help in creating fine-grained tests without cluttering the public interface.

What is your experience with using friend declarations when testing? Was it your Silver Bullet, or did it start the Death March?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. I’ve made extensive use of this technique – it means that my unit tests can test aspects of the code library that aren’t visible to normal consumers.

    While using [InternalsVisibleTo] does increase coupling, I believe the (minor) increase is well worth the gains.

    My unit tests are already tightly coupled to the code under test – though I try to write tests that assure specific outcomes, not specific implementations, by accessing things not visible to regular consumers, I do somewhat constrain the implementation.

    Going the other way, the coupling is minimal – in having the [InternalsVisibleTo] attribute on the code assembly, and in marking some things as internal instead of private (or protected internal instead of protected).

    (Note that I’m ignoring here any design changes that are provoked by the use of Unit Testing, which is a whole other discussion.)

    The [InternalsVisibleTo] attribute requires strong naming your assemblies. If you’re not doing this already, you may find this a bit burdensome as a strongly named assembly may only depend on other strongly named assemblies, which may end up with you needing to alter several assemblies.

    Getting the attribute right can be a bit fiddly, as it needs to include the public key of your test assembly. IDesign have a useful Friend Assembly tool that creates the attribute on your clipboard, ready for pasting. Recommended.

    • 0