Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3396308
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T04:23:32+00:00 2026-05-18T04:23:32+00:00

Often, I need to do an expensive task then display results. So I ramp

  • 0

Often, I need to do an expensive task then display results. So I ramp up a thread. Is there less code, or a better way to doing this than I am currently using?

Example:

ThreadStart job = new ThreadStart (delegate {
    Search d = new Search ();
    x = d.DoSomeWork();
    InvokeOnMainThread (delegate {
         ctl.Show (x);
          });
});

–start the thread here….

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T04:23:32+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 4:23 am

    You can use the thread pool and simplify things a little bit.

    ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem( delegate { /* … */ } );

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When I am writing code in Python, I often need to remove items from
I often need to run reduce (also called foldl / foldr, depending on your
I often need to design a dialog in Delphi/C++Builder that allows various properties of
I have two scripts that often need to be run with the same parameter:
In php, I often need to map a variable using an array ... but
Here at work, we often need to find a string from the list of
While developing products, we often need to create proprietary tools to test some of
My website makes a lot of requests. I often need to cancel all current
Often we need to add a non-nullable column to a table, and it is
Often you need to show a list of database items and certain aggregate numbers

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.