Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5980899
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T21:52:02+00:00 2026-05-22T21:52:02+00:00

Oh man, I’ve got yet another error while compiling the following inline assembly code

  • 0

Oh man, I’ve got yet another error while compiling the following inline assembly code (with -fasm-blocks) under GCC:

_asm
{
    mov ecx, esi
    shr ecx, 2
    rep stosd
};

GCC understands other stos instructions, why won’t it accept stosd???

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T21:52:02+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 9:52 pm

    seeing as your using intel syntax, just go for the explicit version of the STOS command: REP STOS DWORD PTR:[EDI].

    and iirc under gcc, stosd is called stosl.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The man pages for select() do not list EAGAIN as possible error code for
Man's manual have the following Specify the configuration file to use; the default is
Man, I'm peeling the layers of the onion today, anyway here's the code class
From the man page: Deletes all stale tracking branches under <name>. These stale branches
When I was 'man fread', I got this: RETURN VALUE fread() and fwrite() return
Per man pages, snprintf is returning number of bytes written from glibc version 2.2
For example: man(1) , find(3) , updatedb(2) ? What do the numbers in parentheses
For a poor man's implementation of near -collation-correct sorting on the client side I
From the man page on git-merge, there are a number of merge strategies you
From the XDrawString man page it seems that it aceepts signed 32 bit x

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.