Question

Ok, basically there is a large C++ project (Recast) that I want to wrap so that I can use it in my C# project.

I’ve been trying to do this for a while now, and this is what I have so far. I’m using C++/CLI to wrap the classes that I need so that I can use them in C#.

However, there are a ton of structs and enums that I will also need in my C# project. So how do I wrap these?

The basic method I’m using right now is adding dllexport calls to native c++ code, compiling to a dll/lib, adding this lib to my C++/CLI project and importing the c++ headers, then compiling the CLI project into a dll, finally adding this dll as a reference to my C# project. I appreciate any help.

Here is some code..I need manageable way of doing this since the C++ project is so large.

//**Native unmanaged C++ code
//**Recast.h

enum rcTimerLabel
{
   A,
   B,
   C
};

extern "C" {

class __declspec(dllexport) rcContext
{
   public:
   inline rcContect(bool state);
   virtual ~rcContect() {}
   inline void resetLog() { if(m_logEnabled) doResetLog(); }

   protected:
   bool m_logEnabled;
}

struct rcConfig
{
   int width;
   int height;
}

} // end of extern


// **Managed CLI code
// **MyWrappers.h
#include "Recast.h"

namespace Wrappers
{
   public ref class MyWrapper
   {
   private:
     rcContect* _NativeClass;
   public:
     MyWrapper(bool state);
     ~MyWrapper();
     void resetLog();
     void enableLog(bool state) {_NativeClass->enableLog(state); }
   };
}

//**MyWrapper.cpp
#include "MyWrappers.h"

namespace Wrappers
{
   MyWrapper::MyWrapper(bool state)
   {
      _NativeClass = new rcContext(state);
   }

   MyWrapper::~MyWrapper()
   {
      delete _NativeClass;
   }
   void MyWrapper::resetLog()       
   {
      _NativeClass->resetLog();
   }
}


// **C# code
// **Program.cs

namespace recast_cs_test
{
   public class Program
   {
      static void Main()
      {
          MyWrapper myWrapperTest = new MyWrapper(true);
          myWrapperTest.resetLog();
          myWrapperTest.enableLog(true);
      }
   }
}

Answer 1

As a rule, the C/C++ structs are used for communicating with the native code, while you create CLI classes for communicating with the .NET code. C structs are "dumb" in that they can only store data. .NET programmers, on the other hand, expect their data-structures to be "smart". For example:

If I change the "height" parameter in a struct, I know that the height of the object won’t actually change until I pass that struct to an update function. However, in C#, the common idiom is that values are represented as Properties, and updating the property will immediately make those changes "live".

That way I can do things like: myshape.dimensions.height = 15 and just expect it to "work".

To a certain extent, the structures you expose to the .NET developer (as classes) actually ARE the API, with the behaviors being mapped to properties and methods on those classes. While in C, the structures are simply used as variables passed to and from the functions that do the work. In other words, .NET is usually an object-oriented paradigm, while C is not. And a lot of C++ code is actually C with a few fancy bits thrown in for spice.

If you’re writing translation layer between C and .NET, then a big part of your job is to devise the objects that will make up your new API and provide the translation to your underlying functionality. The structs in the C code aren’t necessarily part of your new object hierarchy; they’re just part of the C API.

edit to add:

Also to Consider

Also, you may want to re-consider your choice to use C++/CLI and consider C# and p/invoke instead. For various reasons, I once wrote a wrapper for OpenSSL using C++/CLI, and while it was impressive how easy it was to build and how seamless it worked, there were a few annoyances. Specifically, the bindings were tight, so every time the the parent project (OpenSSL) revved their library, I had to re-compile my wrapper to match. Also, my wrapper was forever tied to a specific architecture (either 64-bit or 32-bit) which also had to match the build architecture of the underlying library. You still get architecture issues with p/invoke, but they’re a bit easier to handle. Also, C++/CLI doesn’t play well with introspection tools like Reflector. And finally, the library you build isn’t portable to Mono. I didn’t think that would end up being an issue. But in the end, I had to start over from scratch and re-do the entire project in C# using p/invoke instead.

On the one hand, I’m glad I did the C++/CLI project because I learned a lot about working with managed and unmanaged code and memory all in one project. But on the other hand, it sure was a lot of time I could have spent on other things.