Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:28:51+00:00 2026-05-11T07:28:51+00:00

OK, I know it can be done, I do it quite often, but why

  • 0

OK, I know it can be done, I do it quite often, but why so difficult to do a loop in T-SQL? I can think of a ton of reasons I’d want to parse thru a query result set and do something that simply can’t be done without a loop, yet the code to setup and execute my loop is > 20 lines.

I’m sure others have a similar opinions so why are we still without a simple way to perform a loop?

An aside: we finally got an UPSERT (aka MERGE) in SQL2008 so maybe all hope isn’t lost.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:28:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:28 am

    SQL is a set-based, declarative language; not a procedural or imperative language. T-SQL tries to straddle the two, but it’s still built on a fundamentally set-based paradigm.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a query that I know can be done using a subselect, but
I know it can be done but am having issues getting it to work.
I know you can do this, because I've seen it done once before, but
This is something I know can be done somehow , because I've done it
I know this can be done and i have seen it done using some
Can CUDA be used to generate OpenGL textures? I know it can be done
I'd like to obscure strings at compile time. I know it can be done
I know it can't be done since using var can only be done for
I know that this can be easily done by using if(i%5 == 0 OR
As far as I know, everything done in XAML can be done in C#.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.