Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6331081
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T17:59:24+00:00 2026-05-24T17:59:24+00:00

Ok. Quick background: MS Access 2003 with 2003/2003 format MDB file upgraded from Access

  • 0

Ok. Quick background:
MS Access 2003 with 2003/2003 format MDB file upgraded from Access 97.

For the purposes of this example, there are two tables.

Table 1
Asset
   ID - (text 20)
   ParentID - (text 20)
   Other fields

AssetRels
   ID - (text 20)

When a record is added to Asset, the ID is added to AssetRels.

From Asset.ID to AssetRels.ID there is a relationship that exists that enforces referential integrity with cascade update and cascade delete.

From AssetRels.ID to Asset.ParentID there is a relationship that enforces referential integrity with cascade update only.

I have 2 records in Asset

VACU0703200, NULL
VACU0703250, VACU0703200

In the data DB, I can go into the table and change VACU0703200 to VACU0704500 and the changes propogate as expected.

If I open the front end DB that links to the data DB, and try the same change (in the table directly) I get “Could not update; currently locked” (no, nothing about ‘another session’, that’s the whole error message)

Both databases are set to “no lock” for the “default record locking”

Obviously, there is some difference in row/page/table level locks that is preventing the cascade update from working.

Does anyone know of some property settings that I can use somewhere to stop this error?
I would prefer not to have to remove the relationship, but otherwise I might have to, and handle it in code.

Edit: Cause is that the table contains a Memo field. Apparently via the linked table, having the Memo field overflow the 4K row size escalates to a table lock. which in turn triggers the problem.

Solution (hackish) is to prevent edits to the ID field on the form, and add a new form to rename. Save changes before opening the new form, and performing the update via an update query works.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T17:59:25+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:59 pm

    Solution (hackish) is to prevent edits to the ID field on the form, and add a new form to rename. Save changes before opening the new form, and performing the update via an update query works.

    The cause is a table lock escalation that occurs when the text overflows the 4K table row limit.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Quick background info: of the three database tables that are relevant for this question,
A quick question: Does IE 6,7 support the css of background-color:inherit; ? for example
quick pagination i have downloaded the pagination from this site, ya really fine ,
Just a quick background. I am willing to open two sockets per thread of
Quick background, I am using Netbeans to develop this (I don't have much experience
Quick background: I'm programming in PHP, I have a domain model with a separate
Quick one, but thought I'd ask. Is there a better way of getting the
Quick question. There is a legacy website (that is not under my control and
Quick background I'm a Java developer who's been playing around with C++ in my
Quick background for those interested, I have a master detail table(options date), about 20

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.