Question

Ok, so everyone knows that capitalised identifiers are seen to be ‘constant’ in Ruby.

However, it is possible to assign a new value to constants, so the following works

class A
  def self.hi; "hi"; end
end
class B
  def self.hi; "ho"; end
end
A.hi # => "hi"
B.hi # => "ho"
A = B
#  warning: already initialized constant A
# => B
A.hi # => "ho"

and also does assigning to a lowercase identifier work:

a = B
a.hi # => "ho"

However, the internal name is set to ‘B’ in all cases and the new identifier names are also only referencing ‘B’.

But if it’s technically okay for the identifier to have a lowercase name, why is this restriction on the internal name for the class? It can’t be that it needs to be constant, because it isn’t constant; so the other reason could be that lowercase identifiers have a different scope. But then: why not having a class with lowercase scope?

I’m wondering because the parser even allows for method names in unicode and such, so it seems strange that for classes it’s so much more restricted.

Answer 1

As you said, the name of a class is that of the first constant it has been assigned to. You can only use constants with the class keyword because it has been decided that the class keyword should only be used to create named classes.

The rationale probably being that allowing local variables would confuse uses, who would use class lowercase_class_name, not knowing the difference between lower case and upper case identifiers and then wonder why the classname was not visible everywhere (i.e. why def foo() lowercase_class_name.new end did not work).

By making the default way to create classes specific to constants, classes defined this way will be visible everywhere and there is at least a suggestion that the value associated with that name should not change (i.e. you get a warning otherwise).

People who know what they’re doing can still do local_variable = Class.new { ... } if they need to.