Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7056475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:52:18+00:00 2026-05-28T03:52:18+00:00

Ok so I have a few ideas for checking whether or not an instance

  • 0

Ok so I have a few ideas for checking whether or not an instance of a process is already running but I wanna find out what other people already do/use first. I’m looking to do something like firefox does sometimes where it says firefox is already running blah blah blah, it only checks to see if there is another copy of itself running, I’m not really looking to check to see if there is just an arbitrary named process running just if there is another copy of itself.

I don’t know whether or not it would be easier to just set up a system to look for an arbitrary process and just look for itself or if it would be better to implement a system for looking for just that process.

I am trying to eventually to lead into being able to communicate with another process so that I could send messages to it.

So say to do the following just as an example: suppose you have firefox already running then you do a command of firefox URLHERE it opens up the new url in the original window that was opened.

I am also trying to figure out how to implement this so if you have any ideas on the best ways in which to do this then by all means please do let me know as well.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:52:18+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:52 am

    Assuming Windows – other operating systems may provide similar constructs but implementation details will vary.

    Look into named pipes or named mutexes.

    A named mutex solution will be easier to code but it will not give you inter-process communication. The theory goes like this: your process attempts to create a named mutex. If it fails it means that another copy of the process is already running. This is guaranteed by the OS – only one named mutex can be created with a specific name. The trick is then in choosing an appropriate name for your mutex so you don’t run the risk of accidental conflict with another program wanting to create/use the same named mutex. For this you could use a GUID. Note however, that a nefarious application could create the named mutex that you’re looking for and prevent your application from ever running

    The second option is to use a named pipe (same story regarding choosing the name). Your process will attempt to create a pipe with a certain name on startup. If creating the pipe fails because the pipe already exists it will go ahead and attempt to connect to the pipe and then you can have the second process exchange information with the first process (i.e. pass on its arguments so that the original process can perform an action)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a few ideas for dealing with this, but I expect the guRus
I have a few ideas about this but here is what I need to
I have a few ideas I would like to try out in the Disk
I have few asynchronous tasks running and I need to wait until at least
I have few Question for which I am not able to get a proper
I have a few Solaris 10 boxes and I'd like to have RDiscount running
I have few different applications among which I'd like to share a C# enum.
I have few question in this regard When you create an internet page, does
We have few components like libraries dlls When initially created I ran the following
I have few nested DIVs at page. I want to add event only for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.