Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 526547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:47:18+00:00 2026-05-13T08:47:18+00:00

Ok, suppose to have this db schema (relation): |User | (1–>n) |Customer | (1–>n)

  • 0

Ok, suppose to have this db schema (relation):

|User    | (1-->n) |Customer | (1-->n) |Car  | (1-->n) |Support    |
|--------|         |---------|         |-----|         |-----------|
|id      |         | user_id |         |Brand|         |Description|
|username|         |lastname |         |PS   |         |Cost       |
|password|         |firstname|         |seats|         |hours      |
|...     |         |..       |         |...  |         |...        |

The table User is generated by Authlogic.

I have 2 registred users, each one has his customers, etc. . With Authlogic I’m able to allow only authenticated users to reach controllers/views. That’s fine, that’s what Authlogic is made for.

Now I need to be sure that the user#1 will never reach informations belonging to customers of user#2.

In other words:
if the user#1 goes to http://myapp.com/cars he will see the list of cars belonging to customers of user#1

if the car with the id=131 belongs to the customer of user#1, only user#1 have to be able to reach this information (http://myapp.com/car/1). If the user#2 insert in the browser the same link he doesn’t have to be able to see this information.

Some people suggested me to create a relation between the user and each db table in order to check if a record is associated to the current_user.

What do you think? What is the best approach/solution?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:47:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:47 am

    So you have 2 things:

    1. In index page of cars controller only cars which belong to the current user should be shown.
    2. You want to restrict show pages to the owner.

    As for the index i suggest something like:

    def index
      # find logic
      @cars = Car.find(:all,:conditions=>{:customer_id => current_user.customers.collect(&:id)})
      # whatever else
      # ...
    end
    

    And the show page:

    def show
      # .....
      # after the find logic
      redirect_to :index unless current_user.customers.collect(&:id).include? @car.customer_id 
      # whatever else
      # ...
    end
    

    This approach is ok for most of the cases, however a better approach for performance is to add a user_id column to the costumers table, this is called denormalization but it’s acceptable for performance wise.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's suppose I have a Word model with this schema var Word = new
Suppose I have a XML schema and want to support some extensions at several
Suppose I have two collections/schemas. One is the Users Schema with username and password
Let's suppose I have a schema like this: var Person = new Schema({ name:
Suppose I have this (outrageously) simplified XML schema: <xsd:complexType name=Person> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref=FirstName/> <xsd:element
Suppose I have this class: class MyClass(object): def uiFunc(self, MainWindow): self.attr1 = foo self.attr2
Suppose I have this table parent | child 1 2 1 3 2 4
Suppose I have this table: id | name | city ------------------ 1 | n1
Suppose I have this (C++ or maybe C) code: vector<int> my_vector; for (int i
Suppose I have this function: void my_test() { A a1 = A_factory_func(); A a2(A_factory_func());

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.