Home/ Questions/Q 728699
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-14T06:42:41+00:00

Ok, this is downright bizarre. I am building a web application that relies on

  • 0

Ok, this is downright bizarre. I am building a web application that relies on long held HTTP connection using COMET, and using this to stream data from the server to the application.

Now, the problem is that this does not seem to go well with some anti-virus programs. We are now on beta, and some users are facing problems with the application when the anti-virus is enabled. It’s not just one specific anti-virus either.. I found this work around for Avast when I looked online: http://avricot.com/blog/index.php?post/2009/05/20/Comet-and-ajax-with-Avast-s-shield-web-:-The-salvation-or-not

However, anyone here has any suggestions on how to handled this? Should I send any specific header to please these security programs?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    This is a tough one. The kind of anti-virus feature that causes this tries to prevent malicious code running in the browser from uploading your personal data to a remote server. To do that, the anti-virus tries to buffer all outgoing traffic before it hits the network, and scan it for pre-defined strings.

    This works when the application sends a complete HTTP request on the socket, because the anti-virus sees the end of the the HTTP request and knows that it can stop scanning and send the data.

    In your case, there’s probably just a header without a length field, so until you send enough data to fill the anti-virus’s buffer, nothing will be written to the network.

    If that’s not a good reason to turn that particular feature off, I don’t know what is. I ran into this with AVast and McAfee – at this point, the rest of the anti-virus industry is probably doing something like that. Specifically, I ran into this with McAfee’s Personal Information Protection feature, which as far as I can tell, is simply too buggy to use.

    If you can, just keep sending data on the socket, or send the data in HTTP messages that have a length field. I tried reporting this to a couple of anti-virus vendors – one of them fixed it, the other one didn’t, to the best of my knowledge.

    Of course, this sort of feature is completely useless. All a malicious application would need to do to get around it is to ROT13 the data before sending it.

    • 0