Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 619251
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:38:04+00:00 2026-05-13T18:38:04+00:00

Older code in our application contains calls to malloc , realloc and free .

  • 0

Older code in our application contains calls to malloc, realloc and free. With our updated code, our own implementations are called instead of the standard runtime ones. Examples are shown below,

#define malloc(s) OurMalloc(s)
#define free(p)   OurFree(p)

This works fine for the updated code and for the newer C++ code we simply implement global new and delete operators, so the C++ solution is ‘cleaner’.

The problem is that we now have to include a 3rd party library, which has classes that contain methods that have names like malloc and free, e.g.

   class ABC
   {
      public:
      ...
      void free (char *p);
   };

If the free method of the class has the same number of arguments, the C/C++ preprocessor simply replaces all occurrences of free by ourFree, even in the class definition, even when calling the method free of the class ABC.
So the class definition above and the following call:

ABC abc;
abc.free(p);

are replaced by,

class ABC
   {
   public:
      ...
      void OurFree (char *p);
   };

ABC abc;
abc.OurFree(p);

Which may compile, but which doesn’t link of course.

If ABC::free has a different number of arguments than the standard free, the compiler still gives a warning. we would like to avoid them.

Some alternative solutions are:

  • undefining our defines in the beginning of the 3rd party include file and redefining it later
  • make sure that the 3rd party include file is always included before our own define’s

But even then, if our code is required to call these malloc or free methods of the 3rd party classes, the preprocessor will still alter the calls, unless we write all calls like this:

(abc::free)(p)

Is there a way to tell a C/C++ preprocessor define that?

  • only pure C-calls must be replaced
  • prototypes MUST NOT be replaced
  • methods in classes MUST NOT be replaced
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:38:04+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:38 pm

    Preprocessor know nothing about about scope and semantic. So short answer – no, you can’t do that.

    But, you can use #undef free in library modules. On other side – this will not help, if you call methods abc.free() from your code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 409k
  • Answers 409k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use .eq(index) like this: postScroll = $('.post').eq(post).offset().top -… May 15, 2026 at 7:10 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Assuming the new form is called "Form1" should look like… May 15, 2026 at 7:10 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It was a problem in my stunnel.conf. There are 3… May 15, 2026 at 7:10 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.