Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 969777
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:41:54+00:00 2026-05-16T02:41:54+00:00

On a multicore box, the java thread schedulers decisions are rather arbitrary, it assigns

  • 0

On a multicore box, the java thread schedulers decisions are rather arbitrary, it assigns thread priorities based on when the thread was created, from which thread it was created etc.

The idea is to run a tuning process using pso that would randomly set thread priorities and then eventually reach optimal priorities where the fitness function is the total run time of the program?

Of course there would be more parameters, like the priorities would shift during the run to find an optimal priority function.

How practical, interesting does the idea sound? and any suggestions.
Just some background,
ive been programming in java/c/c++ for a few years now with various projects, another alternative would be making a thread scheduler based on this in c, where the default thread scheduler is the OS.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:41:54+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:41 am

    Best way to find out — start an open source project and see people’s usage/reaction.

    It sounds very interesting to me — but I personally don’t find it very much useful. Perhaps we’re just not at the point where concurrent programming is as prevalent and easy as it could be.

    With the promotion of functional programming, I guess the world would move towards avoiding thread synchronization as much as possible (thus making thread scheduling less of an impact in overall performance)

    From my personal subjective experience, most performance problems in software can be solved by improving one single bottleneck area that accounts for 90% of the slowdown. This optimizer may help find that out. I am not sure how much the scheduling strategy could improve overall performance, though.

    Don’t get discouraged, though! I’m just talking out of thin air. It sounds fun, so why not just play with it anyway 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Follow up question from Multi-core usage, threads, thread-pools . Are threads moved from one
I'm trying to multicore a function (in Windows), which, at one point, calls another
Which embedded processors are the closest to x86 multicore systems, that is, which has
Lets assume that I have a computer which has a multicore processor and a
So I have set up Solr with multiple cores using the MultiCore feature which
As I wanted to benefit from new multicore threading improvements from .Net Framework 4,
There seems to be a lot of fuss about multicore and java. While some
While i like the intellectual challenge coming from the design of multicore systems i
On a multicore processor, if I create a subshell from a shell script file
I have a java app, and, I want it to take advantage of multicore

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.