Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 96067
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:45:24+00:00 2026-05-10T23:45:24+00:00

On C# 3.0 and .NET 3.5, imagine there’s an interface: public interface INameable {

  • 0

On C# 3.0 and .NET 3.5, imagine there’s an interface:

public interface INameable {   string Name {get;} } 

and many immutable classes that implement the interface.

I would like to have a single extension method

public static T Rename<T>(this T obj) where T : INameable {    ... } 

that returns a wrapped instance of the original object with just the name changed and all other property reads and method calls routed to the original object.

How to get a generic wrapper class for this, without implementing it for all INameable implementing types? Do you think that’s possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:45:25+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:45 pm

    No, this isn’t possible, unless T is constrained to be an interface or to be a class with all members virtual, and this constraint isn’t possible to specify at compile time (though you could write a runtime check if you’re happy with that approach).

    The reason you cannot do it for arbitrary types is that if you take an object of type T then you must return an object that is assignable to T. If I pass an object that looks as follows…

    public sealed class SomeClass : INameable {     public string Name { get; }     public string Abc { get; } } 

    …then there is no way you can create another type that is assignable to SomeClass. Not using Reflection.Emit or any other method, because the type is sealed.

    However, if you’re happy with the restrictions that I’ve mentioned then you could use something like the Castle DynamicProxy framework to create a type that proxies the passed in object and intercepts the calls to either forward or re-implement as appropriate.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Imagine a 5 MB jar file that contains many main classes, each of which
I can't imagine that there doesn't exist an efficient, lightweight, secure authentication and authorization
Imagine an abstract problem. There is a client ( C ) that interacts to
I am wondering whether there are libraries in .NET that make it easy to
Imagine an ASP.Net 2.0+ app that uses the built-in role-based security to restrict users
Let's imagine I have a Service method which creates a customer: public Customer CreateCustomer(string
I need to implement a grid in asp.net that behaves almost exactly like MS
In .NET 2.0 (in this case VB), is there a standard API that'll serialize
I have what I imagine to be a pretty standard web-interface. There are 4
Imagine a pure .NET application which do not uses COM components nor PInvoke. Does

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.