Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 66937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T19:10:53+00:00 2026-05-10T19:10:53+00:00

On Linux (or Solaris) is there a better way than hand parsing /proc/self/maps repeatedly

  • 0

On Linux (or Solaris) is there a better way than hand parsing /proc/self/maps repeatedly to figure out whether or not you can read, write or execute whatever is stored at one or more addresses in memory?

For instance, in Windows you have VirtualQuery.

In Linux, I can mprotect to change those values, but I can’t read them back.

Furthermore, is there any way to know when those permissions change (e.g. when someone uses mmap on a file behind my back) other than doing something terribly invasive and using ptrace on all threads in the process and intercepting any attempt to make a syscall that could affect the memory map?

Update:

Unfortunately, I’m using this inside of a JIT that has very little information about the code it is executing to get an approximation of what is constant. Yes, I realize I could have a constant map of mutable data, like the vsyscall page used by Linux. I can safely fall back on an assumption that anything that isn’t included in the initial parse is mutable and dangerous, but I’m not entirely happy with that option.

Right now what I do is I read /proc/self/maps and build a structure I can binary search through for a given address’s protection. Any time I need to know something about a page that isn’t in my structure I reread /proc/self/maps assuming it has been added in the meantime or I’d be about to segfault anyways.

It just seems that parsing text to get at this information and not knowing when it changes is awfully crufty. (/dev/inotify doesn’t work on pretty much anything in /proc)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T19:10:54+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 7:10 pm

    I do not know an equivalent of VirtualQuery on Linux. But some other ways to do it which may or may not work are:

    • you setup a signal handler trapping SIGBUS/SIGSEGV and go ahead with your read or write. If the memory is protected, your signal trapping code will be called. If not your signal trapping code is not called. Either way you win.

    • you could track each time you call mprotect and build a corresponding data structure which helps you in knowing if a region is read or write protected. This is good if you have access to all the code which uses mprotect.

    • you can monitor all the mprotect calls in your process by linking your code with a library redefining the function mprotect. You can then build the necessary data structure for knowing if a region is read or write protected and then call the system mprotect for really setting the protection.

    • you may try to use /dev/inotify and monitor the file /proc/self/maps for any change. I guess this one does not work, but should be worth the try.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there anyone out there that is currently deploying rails applications on a solaris
Linux: It there a way to edit a compiled shared library ? specifically I
I'm writing some small bash scripts for copiyng certain files/directories in GNU/Linux and Solaris.
Linux Assembly Tutorial states: there is one very important thing to remember: If you
In Linux (Ubuntu), I want to programmatically check if there is Internet connection (or
My company is considering moving from Solaris to Linux, but some FUD has been
I am porting some Solaris code to Linux. This code uses the Solaris-specific door
Is there a way to force '-m64' not overriding CXXFLAGS/CFLAGS. I want automatic x64
I have a large framework consisting of many C++ classes. Is there a way
I have written some code which compiles fine under linux but on Solaris I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.