Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8034621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T02:04:51+00:00 2026-06-05T02:04:51+00:00

On most moder 64-bit processors (such as Intel Core 2 Duo or the Intel

  • 0

On most moder 64-bit processors (such as Intel Core 2 Duo or the Intel i7 series), does the speed of the x86_64 command mulq and its variants depend on the operands? For example, will multiplying 11 * 13 be faster than 11111111 * 13131313? Or does it always take the time of the worst case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T02:04:52+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 2:04 am

    I don’t have any reference to hand, but I would place money on the latency/throughput being invariant of the values of the operands. Otherwise, it would be a nightmare to schedule.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The title of this question might be a bit off but its the closest
This question was inspired a bit by this question , in which the most
In the x86-64 Tour of Intel Manuals , I read Perhaps the most surprising
This question is a bit different than most. My code works but I don't
In most modern IDEs there is a parameter that you can set to ensure
It's standard in most modern editors that you can highlight a piece of code
It appears that most modern languages and tools allow for extended regular expressions, and
I know modern browsers remove most space chars and '&nbsp'; characters insider a paragraph
Why do most developers consider the W3C box model to be better than the
I'm using js2-mode for working with javascript in emacs and for the most part

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.