Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8701897
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T02:30:51+00:00 2026-06-13T02:30:51+00:00

on this project we do not use the default dataannotation attributes from the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations

  • 0

on this project we do not use the default dataannotation attributes from the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace, but custom attributes are built.

So we do place a [required] attribute on a property, but it’s a custom built one.

For server side validation we managed to override the validation with a custom validation provider, but we are stuck with tthe client side validation.

As i read in the docs, i see that when you use the default [required] attribute, these kind of attributes are rendered on the html elements:

data-val-lengthmax="10" data-val-length-min="3" data-val-required="The ClientName field is required."

I presume that is done by the framework, which reads the normal required attribute, and then renders the html attributes.

Can we make the framework render these attributes for us too?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T02:30:53+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:30 am

    Can we make the framework render these attributes for us too?

    Yes, there are 2 possibilities:

    1. Have your custom attribute implement the IClientValidatable interface where you would implement the client validation rules.
    2. Register a custom DataAnnotationsModelValidator<TAttribute> where TAttribute will be your custom validation attribute and where you would implement your custom client side validation rules (that’s the approach used by Microsoft to implement client side validation for the Required attribute and that’s why if you write a custom validator attribute which derives from it you don’t get client side validation). Then you need to register your custom model validator with the custom attribute using DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider.RegisterAdapter call.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a not related to my project code , but a question came
System.Diagnostics.Contracts.ContractException is not accessible in my test project. Note this code is purely myself
This project was coped almost exacatly from the example on the admob page but
I currently have a project built with maven-archetype-webapp artifact. The default packaging for this
This is not a ruby/rails project deploy. I have the following situation and I
This is my first azure project and I'm not sure if I'm doing something
This might not have a major usecase in projects, but I was just trying
I found a couple questions similar to this, but not specifically for .NET projects,
I am using custom InfoPath task form in my project. All works fine, but
I am using Kdevelop4, and would like to use a default CMake c++ project.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.