Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 750669
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T14:34:39+00:00 2026-05-14T14:34:39+00:00

Once the singleton pattern is understood, writing subsequent singleton classes in C# is a

  • 0

Once the singleton pattern is understood, writing subsequent singleton classes in C# is a brainless exercise. I would hope that the framework would help you by providing an interface or a base class to do that. Here is how I envision it:

public sealed class Schablone : ISingleton<Schablone>
{
    // Stuff forced by the interface goes here

    // Extra logic goes here
}

Does what I am looking for exist?

Is there some syntactic sugar for constructing a singleton class – whether with an interface, a class attribute, etc.?

Can one write a useful and bullet-proof ISingleton themselves? Care to try?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T14:34:39+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:34 pm

    No, there is nothing in the .Net framework like this. You have to write singletons yourself. It would be a bit hard to have a definative API for singletons as there are so many ways of implementing them, and depending on your goals depends on what approach you will take.

    I would suggest you read this article on singletons. (Written by Jon – He’s a wise guy, listen to him) for guidance and tips on the various techniques. It covers some stuff that most people might not have thought about.

    [A lot of people consider the singleton pattern to be a dubious design pattern. I won’t go into the reasons here, but if your interested google has loads of info. Just be careful you don’t overuse it unnecessarily.]

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 374k
  • Answers 374k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The url fragment (the part after #) is never passed… May 14, 2026 at 7:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should just check to see if the array is… May 14, 2026 at 7:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Thanks I found out a solution. print "Content-Type:application/x-download\n"; print "Content-Disposition:attachment;filename=$ID\n\n"; May 14, 2026 at 7:54 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.