Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4028292
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T11:12:09+00:00 2026-05-20T11:12:09+00:00

Once work items in a particular workflow reach a tested/resolved end state, I don’t

  • 0

Once work items in a particular workflow reach a “tested/resolved” end state, I don’t want them to be editable. I could enter Field restrictions on the end state for every field that exists, but that’s a pain and doesn’t easily support the addition of future fields. Is there an easier way?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T11:12:10+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:12 am

    Alas, I don’t think there is an “out of the box” way to do this except for using the “when” clause on each of the fields or adding it to the state transitions to “tested/resolved” (as you have indicated).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

More than once I've lost work by accidentally killing a temporary buffer in Emacs.
Once I have all the files I require in a particular folder, I would
I'm building an application with the following criteria: work items: items that need to
I have a Web server that updates its data once per minute, and want
Once again one of those: Is there an easier built-in way of doing things
Once I've created a variable in the immediate window in C# (VS2008), is there
Once a user starts a session (or logs in, for a registered user, to
Once again a very beginner-ish question, but here I go: I would like to
Once a programmer decides to implement IXmlSerializable , what are the rules and best
Once it is compiled, is there a difference between: delegate { x = 0;

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.