Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8502777
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T01:34:48+00:00 2026-06-11T01:34:48+00:00

Once you apply a filterFunction to an ArrayCollection, it’s permanent, isn’t it? For example,

  • 0

Once you apply a filterFunction to an ArrayCollection, it’s permanent, isn’t it?

For example, I apply a filterFunction to a collection and make a remote call to repopulate the ArrayCollection via addItem().

Let’s say 20 items were added.

If I then trace out the collection length it appears as 0. That’s because the filter is in place and all the data I just added didn’t meet the criteria.

Is that right?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T01:34:50+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 1:34 am

    Once you apply a filterFunction to an ArrayCollection, it’s permanent, isn’t it?

    Yes, until you change it. Once you change it to something else and call collection.refresh().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Once a push notification is sent to a device via APNS, what are normal
Once again I'm receiving structs via UDP from a C++ programm, Now I ported
How to apply Jquery DatePicker to multiple elements. at once?? Suppose i have 3
Is it possible to apply 2 box-shadows to a HTML element at once? I
Once again, I'm at a loss with IE7 on this one. I'm making a
Once upon a time I was thought by more advanced web developers (gee, when
Once you've got the hang on your typical R error messages they're quite useful.
Once I use visualTreeHelper.getchild to find a child object, how would I get the
Once again, lists are boggling my mind. <div id=headbottom> <ul id=headnavbutton> <li id=button1 class=headnavbutton></li>
Once again my silliness has struck. I would like to thank everyone who helped

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.